On June 8, the Pennsylvania Environmental Council and Environmental Defense Fund wrote to members of the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee urging them to oppose House Bill 2025 (Struzzi-R- Indiana) to take away DEP’s authority to enact any program to reduce carbon pollution emissions.
The Committee is scheduled to consider the bill on June 9. Read more here.
On June 8, Gov. Tom Wolf said at a press conference on an unrelated issue he will veto House Bill 2025 (Struzzi-R- Indiana) which would take away DEP’s authority to enact any program to reduce carbon pollution emissions. Read more here.
On June 8, Gov. Tom Wolf said at a press conference on an unrelated issue he will veto House Bill 2025 (Struzzi-R- Indiana) which would take away DEP’s authority to enact any program to reduce carbon pollution emissions. Read more here.
“This legislation is written to allow the General Assembly to block the Department’s rulemaking proposal through mere inaction. Furthermore, House Bill 2025 also attempts to revise policy precedent and statutory authority relating to the control of air pollution in our Commonwealth.”
“Through the Air Pollution Control Act (APCA), the legislature has already set forth very clear declarations of policy and authoritative provisions that direct the Department to adopt rules and regulations for the prevention, control, and reduction of air pollution, broadly defined as any pollution or emissions “which may be inimical to the public health, safety or welfare or which is or may be injurious to human, plant or animal life or to property or which unreasonably interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property.”
“Greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide clearly fall within the design and intent of the APCA; particularly given the findings generated pursuant to the Climate Change Act.”
“The proposed rulemaking set forth by the Department has provided a basis for constructive dialogue on Pennsylvania’s energy and climate future. That dialogue needs to happen now, and the General Assembly is integral to that process.
“But the effect of House Bill 2025 does more to close the door than set a path forward.”
The text of the letter follows--
Dear Representatives:
Tomorrow the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee will meet to consider House Bill 2025 (P.N. 2926), which mandates that any rulemaking addressing carbon dioxide emissions be affirmatively approved by the General Assembly.
The Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) urge you to oppose this legislation for the reasons provided in this letter. Our concerns lie both in the framework of the bill itself as well as in broader implications for the Commonwealth.
The General Assembly Must Affirmatively Act on Energy and Climate
In 2008, with bipartisan support, the General Assembly passed the Pennsylvania Climate Change Act (Act 70 of 2008).
Recognizing the immediacy and consequence of climate change to our state, this legislation charged the Department of Environmental Protection (Department) with developing a Climate Change Action Plan, to be updated every three years, that would identify cost-effective strategies for addressing greenhouse gas emissions, including policy recommendations to the General Assembly.
In addition, periodic assessments have been developed in consultation with Penn State University on the economic, health, and environmental impacts to Pennsylvania resulting from climate change.
The Action Plans and Impacts Analyses have consistently underscored the consensus that climate change is an immediate economic and environmental concern, and that our state’s contribution to greenhouse emissions is globally significant.
These findings mirror public and private conclusions from interests as far ranging as the scientific community, the U.S. Military, investment and financial institutions, and utilities and energy companies.
Despite all this, and even with a majority of Pennsylvanians in support of specific policies and actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions-- even factoring the Covid-19 pandemic-- the General Assembly has essentially remained silent.
There has been no comprehensive legislative action to address climate change, or to best position Pennsylvania for the necessary transformation to a net zero economy.
This includes failing to address impacts to communities already significantly affected by changes to our energy portfolio even with the absence of policy action.
This runs counter to bi-partisan action in legislatures across the country which have passed ambitious legislation to hasten and support the transition to the clean economy.
Our legislature can and should lead the charge on maximizing the economic and employment opportunities provided through clean and net zero technologies, and to help communities adapt to the inevitable transitions that have occured and will continue in the years to come.
PEC has provided policy recommendations for decarbonization of Pennsylvania’s electricity sector which are premised on an “all in” approach that can maintain and improve the state’s energy portfolio.
Chief among those recommendations is for Pennsylvania to link to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a proven market-based platform that provides cost-effective and flexible means to reduce emissions from the electricity sector while returning revenue to our state for investment in communities, jobs, and businesses.
RGGI has helped other states reduce their emissions, lower energy prices, and create jobs. RGGI’s emission allowance design mirrors other successful air pollution programs in which Pennsylvania has already participated in.
There are built-in protections to help control costs and the program has been deemed successful in terms of price discovery, transparency, transaction costs, and other logistical considerations.
In short, joining RGGI is the most sensible and adaptable program to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. It is supported by states, environmental organizations and business and energy interests alike.
The Department has now developed proposed rulemaking to have the state link to RGGI beginning in 2022.
Even though this rulemaking is in its preliminary stage, the agency has taken extraordinary steps to model and publicly present the anticipated environmental and economic benefits and impacts of the proposal-- even before the public comment period, and before a full regulatory analysis of the draft proposal that will be provided to the General Assembly and public.
Full analysis is of course essential and we welcome robust dialogue on energy and climate policy; but there must be a corresponding commitment to finding solutions.
House Bill 2025 is not that vehicle.
This legislation is written to allow the General Assembly to block the Department’s rulemaking proposal through mere inaction. Furthermore, House Bill 2025 also attempts to revise policy precedent and statutory authority relating to the control of air pollution in our Commonwealth.
House Bill 2025 is a Step Backwards
Our concerns with House Bill 2025 are as follows:
-- Redundancy with the Regulatory Review Act: House Bill 2025 sets forth public outreach and informational requirements that are already established by the Regulatory Review Act.
We support assurance that rulemakings are fully vetted by the public and supported with sufficient examination; we merely raise this point to explain that long-established processes are already in place-- including public comment and hearings, development of regulatory analysis and comment/response documents, and prescribed review by the General Assembly, Independent Regulatory Review Commission, Attorney General, Environmental Quality Board, and multiple advisory boards.
As such, House Bill 2025 is unnecessary to accomplish these ends.
-- Conflicts with Existing Statutory and Constitutional Authority: House Bill 2025 asserts that existing law does not provide the Department with the authority to develop a rulemaking for greenhouse gas emissions, but this is not the case.
Through the Air Pollution Control Act (APCA), the legislature has already set forth very clear declarations of policy and authoritative provisions that direct the Department to adopt rules and regulations for the prevention, control, and reduction of air pollution, broadly defined as any pollution or emissions “which may be inimical to the public health, safety or welfare or which is or may be injurious to human, plant or animal life or to property or which unreasonably interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property.”
Greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide clearly fall within the design and intent of the APCA; particularly given the findings generated pursuant to the Climate Change Act.
House Bill 2025 also runs counter to the intent and express language of the Environmental Rights Amendment in our state Constitution, which establishes an affirmative obligation on both the Governor and General Assembly to protect public resources, including air and water quality.
The premise set forth by House Bill 2025 that the Department is acting on unfounded authority is erroneous and an oblique attempt to rewrite long-established statutory precedent.
-- Dismissal Through Inaction: Finally, House Bill 2025 grants the legislature the ability to halt the Department’s proposed rulemaking through mere inaction. This rests the power of decision in a small handful of leadership and committee chairs who would be under no obligation to act.
Under current law, and at any time, the legislature has the discretion to pass legislation to restart or abrogate a rulemaking proposal. House Bill 2025 makes special expansion of this authority solely for a rulemaking proposal designed to address greenhouse gas emissions.
Aside from stacking the deck against movement on a critical public issue, the legislation raises constitutional questions.
This provision of the bill does more to ensure that a rulemaking will not be promulgated than it does to ensure full examination and engagement.
Conclusion
The proposed rulemaking set forth by the Department has provided a basis for constructive dialogue on Pennsylvania’s energy and climate future. That dialogue needs to happen now, and the General Assembly is integral to that process.
But the effect of House Bill 2025 does more to close the door than set a path forward. As such, we urge you to oppose this legislation.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Walliser Mandy Warner
Senior Vice President Director, Climate and
PA Environmental Council Clean Air Policy
Senior Vice President Director, Climate and
PA Environmental Council Clean Air Policy
Environmental Defense Fund
For more information on programs, initiatives and special events, visit the PA Environmental Council website, visit the PEC Blog, PEC Bill/Regulation Tracker, follow PEC on Twitter or Like PEC on Facebook. Visit PEC’s Audio Room for the latest podcasts. Click Here to receive regular updates from PEC.
Related Article:
Related Articles - Carbon Pollution:
-- Op-Ed: My Fellow Conservatives Are Out Of Touch On The Environment - Fmr. Gov. Tom Ridge
[Posted: June 8, 2020] PA Environment Digest
No comments :
Post a Comment