Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Former DEP Officials Support Putting Susquehanna, Juniata Rivers On Impaired Waters List

On May 15, 22 retired environmental professionals from the Department of Environmental Protection wrote to current DEP Secretary Michael Krancer asking his agency to reverse its decision to not list the Susquehanna and Juniata rivers on the 2012 Section 303(d) impaired waters list.  The letter follows--
Dear Secretary Krancer:
I represent a group of 22 retired DEP professionals with over 600 years of combined service in managing, establishing standards, permitting, monitoring, and enforcing in the Commonwealth's water quality and pollution control programs. Our names are included on the attached list. Our careers spanned from the 1950s to the recent past. Most of the Commonwealth's water quality related laws, regulations and policies were developed and implemented on our watch.  We believe in the goals of improving and maintaining water quality for the benefit of all Pennsylvanians.
            We are writing to express our concern and submit comments regarding DEP's proposed 2012 Section 303 (d) list. Specifically, we are concerned about environmental conditions that exist in the Susquehanna and Juniata Rivers, particularly regarding the smallmouth bass population and DEP's refusal to acknowledge that these waters are impaired. Our concerns are similar to those of PA Fish and Boat Commission Executive Director John Arway, which he has recently conveyed to you.
            Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act requires that the states periodically provide the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with a list of impaired and threatened waters and their cause, if identified. A number of us were involved in preparing this list during our years of employment. We maintain it is not necessary to know the cause or source of the impairment prior to listing. According to EPA's most recent fact sheet, there are thousands of waters nationwide where the causes or sources are not yet identified. In fact, DEP's proposed 2012 list of impaired and threatened waters also includes 3,482 miles of streams and rivers that are classified by DEP as impaired without knowing the sources, and 1,140 miles of streams and rivers that are classified by DEP as impaired by unknown causes.  The Susquehanna and Juniata Rivers fit several of EPA’s listing categories. These include failure to meet a designated use (Warm Water Fishes), violations of the dissolved oxygen criteria, and presence of noxious weeds. All of these conditions are well documented from Sunbury to the Holtwood Dam in the Susquehanna River basin. A warm water fishes use is defined as maintenance and propagation of fish species and additional flora and fauna which are indigenous to a warm water habitat (25 PA Code Chapter 93).  The evidence is clear that the water quality of the rivers no longer supports this use. 
            We further believe that these rivers meet the following criteria for high priority impaired and threatened designation: Risk to human health and aquatic life; Degree of public interest and support; Recreational, economic and aesthetic importance; and Vulnerability and fragility as an aquatic habitat.
            Listing the rivers as high priority impaired and threatened will compel DEP to develop a TMDL in two years (40 CFR 130.7(d)(1)).  This will be a first step toward bringing the rivers back to a healthy condition.
            Frankly, we do not understand DEP's reluctance to list the Susquehanna and Juniata Rivers as impaired. It is not necessary to know the reason for the impairment. Listing would focus attention and funding on the issue. This, in turn, will help to resolve the problem.
            These rivers were once a valuable water supply, recreational, and economic resource. They were recognized as a world class smallmouth bass fishery. Many of our group enjoyed what they had to offer. We would like to enjoy these attributes again.
            As former DEP scientists, engineers and attorneys we take pride in what we have accomplished. We are also willing to volunteer our time and experience to assist DEP in restoring and preserving this significant resource.


Sincerely,


-- Stuart Gansell, PE, Director, Bureau of Watershed Management (Ret), 35 years
-- Robert Agnew, Chief, Environmental Analysis and Support, Bur. of Mining and Reclamation, 34 years
-- Daniel L. Alters, Environmental Program Manager, Williamsport Regional Office, 35 years
-- Charles D. Ferree, Jr., Sewage Planning Supervisor, Water Management Program 32 years
-- Andrew E. Friedrich, Chief, Division of Mine Hazards, Bur. of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, 35 years
-- Robert P. Ging, Jr., Esq.  Assistant Attorney General, 4 years
-- Steve R. Jones, Chief, Division of Mine Hazards, Bur. of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, 26 years
-- Michael J. Klimkos, Water Pollution Biologist II, 32 Years
-- Susan M. Klimkos, Clerical Supervisor, 15 years
-- Milt Lauch, Chief, Division of Wastewater Management, Bureau of Water Quality Management, 33 years
-- Walter A. Lyon Pa. Water Quality Administrator, 22 years
-- John Meehan, Mining Program Manager, 33 years
-- Leon M. Oberdick Jr, Water Management Program Manager, Southcentral Regional Office, 35 years
-- Kenneth Okorn, Chief – Compliance and Monitoring, Bureau of Water Quality Management, 32 years
-- Curtis Pieper, Executive Assistant, Office of Mineral Resources Management, 20 years
-- Robert J. Schott,  BS/MS, Water Pollution Biologist Supervisor, Water Management Program, 32 years
-- Joseph Schueck, P.E., PG. Chief, Division of Acid Mine Drainage Abatement, BAMR, 36 years
-- Evan T. Shuster, Hydrogeologist, 35 years
-- Peter Slack, Division Chief, Bureaus of Water Quality Management and Mining and Reclamation, 30 years
-- Khervin D. Smith, Esq., 35 years
-- James T. Ulanoski, BS/MS, Water Pollution Biologist, Chief Aquatic Biology Section, 25 years
-- Robert J. Wellington, Biologist, 36 Years